B-Series Overview — Quantum Mechanics as Emergent Representation

The B-series (Papers B1–B5) constitutes a complete derivation of non-relativistic quantum mechanics as an emergent representational calculus forced by substrate mechanics. This overview explains what the B-series assumes, what it derives, and how the papers connect.

What the B-Series Is

The B-series is a representational recovery programme, not an ontological claim or alternative quantum theory.

Core thesis: Quantum mechanics is the unique stable calculus for representing cohesive substrates that exhibit divergent-yet-mergeable histories under finite tolerance $W$.

Method: Stepwise derivation showing that quantum formalism is forced by representational consistency, not assumed as axioms.

Epistemic role: Demonstrates that quantum structure emerges necessarily from substrate mechanics. Does not propose new physics or replace quantum mechanics — instead shows why QM has the form it does.

---

What the B-Series Assumes

The B-series builds on established substrate mechanics and formal mechanisms from earlier series. It does not derive these foundations; it assumes them.

Substrate Mechanics (A-Series)

The B-series assumes a discrete substrate with:

• Finite alphabet $\Sigma$ and locations $V$
• Local constraint system $\mathcal{C}$ defining admissibility
• Mismatch measure $M(v;X)$ for configurations
• Commit semantics: configurations may diverge through admissible alternatives

Key reference: Paper A — Substrate Mechanics

Axioms (Selective, Not Complete Re-enumeration)

The B-series operates within the quantum-capable substrate envelope classified as DCC-QM (Derived Capability Class for Quantum Mechanics) in R-DCC.

Central axioms directly used:

• AX-TOL (Tolerance): Finite tolerance window $W$ enabling mergeability without rigidity
• AX-ADM (Admissibility): Non-empty set of admissible local transitions
• AX-PAR (Partition): Tolerance violation creates partition, not failure
• AX-COH (Cohesion): Mutual mismatch within $W$ defines cohesive units

Supporting axioms (via DCC-QM envelope):

• AX-REL (Relational Evolution)
• AX-CON (Global Constraint Invariance)
• AX-SEL (Precedence)
• AX-MEM (Persistence)

Key insight: Rather than re-enumerate all substrate axioms in each paper, the B-series references DCC-QM as the capability envelope, while calling out AX-TOL and AX-PAR explicitly where they play active operational roles (e.g., in B3 closure stability, B4 decoherence, B5 measurement).

Reference: R-DCC for DCC-QM definition; /research/current-theory/axioms/axioms.md for individual axiom statements.

Formal Mechanisms (M-Series)

The B-series assumes:

• M1 — Cohesion and persistence mechanics
• M2 — Admissibility, precedence, construction
• M3 — Modes and discrete stability
• M4 — Provenance, phase, and compatibility structure

These mechanisms are not re-derived. The B-series uses them as given structural features.

---

What the B-Series Derives

The B-series shows that all quantum structure is forced by representational consistency under substrate mechanics. Nothing is imported from quantum axioms.

Derived Structures with Paper Links

Structure	Derivation	Paper	Key Insight
Hilbert space	Linear amplitude representation forced by mergeable divergence	B1	States are bookkeeping objects, not ontology
Linearity	Regrouping, associativity, history-order invariance force linear composition	B1	Derived, not assumed
Superposition	Mergeability within tolerance $W$ forces amplitude addition	B1	Representational necessity
Tensor products	Joint admissibility forces composite structure	B2	Emerges from representation
Entanglement	Non-factorisable cross-terms forced by joint constraints under $W$	B2	Unavoidable once composites exist
Spectral discreteness	Closure stability selects discrete modes; continuous configs fail closure	B3	Selection effect, not boundary condition
Quantisation	Only discrete families satisfy commit-cycle closure within $W$	B3	Forced by tolerance-limited admissibility
Unitary evolution	Closure-preserving transport uniquely determines Schrödinger-class dynamics	B4	Derived from representational consistency
Hamiltonians	Bookkeeping devices for stable transport, not fundamental operators	B4	Descriptors, not primitives
Born rule	Quadratic weighting uniquely preserves coherence under composition and partition	B5	Only weighting rule satisfying constraints
Measurement	Commit (AX-PAR partition) creates branches; no collapse postulate needed	B5	Substrate operation, not new physics

Critical result: The entire quantum formalism — Hilbert spaces, linearity, entanglement, quantisation, unitary dynamics, and Born-rule probabilities — emerges from one substrate feature: mergeable divergence under finite tolerance $W$.

---

Explicit Boundaries — What B-Series Does NOT Claim

The B-series has strict scope limits. It does not address:

Not Derived (Outside Scope)

• Gravity and metric structure — Requires extension to geometric degrees of freedom (future work)
• Quantum field theory — Requires relativistic extensions and field emergence (future work)
• Specific Hamiltonians — B4 derives the form of dynamics, not particular interaction potentials
• Empirical calibration of $W$ — B-series assumes $W$ exists; calibration is future work

Not Claimed (By Design)

• Ontological status — B-series establishes representational necessity, not ontology (see F-series)
• Replacement of QM — B-series recovers QM, does not replace it
• Alternative interpretation — B-series is agnostic to Copenhagen/Many-Worlds/Bohmian debates
• Empirical validation — B-series shows structural necessity; empirical tests require $W$ calibration

Key distinction: The B-series is a representational recovery, not a new quantum theory. It explains why quantum mechanics has the form it does, given substrate mechanics.

---

The Role of $W$ in the B-Series

The finite tolerance window $W$ (defined in AX-TOL) is the central constraint that makes quantum formalism necessary.

How $W$ Functions Across Papers

In B1 — Mergeability Boundary
$W$ defines when divergent substrate histories remain mergeable. Configurations within tolerance can still interfere and superpose. This forces linear amplitude representation.

In B2 — Joint Admissibility
$W$ bounds the compatibility load for composite systems. Joint constraints must remain within $W$ to preserve coherence. This forces non-factorisable (entangled) cross-terms.

In B3 — Closure Stability Threshold
$W$ determines which configurations admit stable closure. Discrete modes satisfy closure conditions within $W$; continuous configurations generically violate tolerance. This forces quantisation.

In B4 — Decoherence Partition
$W$ violation triggers partition (AX-PAR), separating coherent evolution from decohered branches. Unitary dynamics preserve states within $W$. This forces closure-preserving dynamics.

In B5 — Weighting Constraint
$W$ bounds the interference structure that outcome weighting must preserve. Only quadratic weighting (Born rule) maintains coherence under composition and partition. This forces Born-rule statistics.

Why $W$ Is Not Free

$W$ is not a tunable parameter — it is the coherence boundary defining the quantum regime.

• Larger $W$ would permit non-quantum interference patterns
• Smaller $W$ would fragment coherence entirely, preventing stable construction
• The quantum regime is the stability envelope where $W$ admits divergence without destroying coherence

Empirical status: $W$ exists (required for constructors to emerge, per E-series). Its numerical value is not yet calibrated empirically.

---

Paper-to-Paper Flow

The B-series proceeds through a strict logical chain. Each paper builds exclusively on earlier papers and substrate axioms.

Dependency Structure

B1 → establishes linear amplitude representation
 ↓
B2 → extends to composite systems (entanglement)
 ↓
B3 → derives discrete spectra (quantisation)
 ↓
B4 → establishes unitary dynamics
 ↓
B5 → completes with Born rule and measurement

Key properties:

• Sequential only: No circular dependencies
• Additive: Each paper adds one new structural layer
• Minimal: Each paper derives one necessity at a time

What Each Paper Assumes

Paper	Assumes from Earlier B-Papers	New Derivation
B1	None (uses A, M only)	Linear amplitude spaces
B2	B1 (linear representation)	Entanglement / non-factorisability
B3	B1, B2 (amplitude + composition)	Spectral discreteness / quantisation
B4	B1, B2, B3 (states + discrete basis)	Unitary dynamics / Schrödinger evolution
B5	B1, B2, B3, B4 (full QM structure)	Born rule / measurement

Reading strategy: Read in order. Each paper is incomprehensible without earlier papers but does not require later papers.

---

Reviewer Audit Map

This section provides a quick reference for reviewers checking whether quantum structure was assumed or derived.

Imported vs. Derived — What Came From Where

Quantum Structure	Status in B-Series	Justification
Hilbert space	Derived / Forced	B1 proves linear amplitude structure is the only stable representation (not assumed)
Linearity	Derived / Forced	B1 shows regrouping + associativity + history-order invariance force linearity (not assumed)
Superposition	Derived / Forced	B1 shows mergeability within $W$ forces amplitude addition (not assumed)
Complex numbers	Derived / Forced	B1 derives phase bookkeeping from closure cycles; B4 justifies complex structure dynamically (not assumed)
Tensor products	Derived / Emergent	B2 shows joint admissibility forces composite structure (not assumed)
Entanglement	Derived / Forced	B2 proves non-factorisable cross-terms are unavoidable under joint constraints (not assumed)
Spectral discreteness	Derived / Forced	B3 shows only discrete modes satisfy closure stability (not assumed)
Quantisation	Derived / Selection Effect	B3 proves continuous configs fail closure; discrete families forced by $W$ (not assumed)
Unitary evolution	Derived / Forced	B4 shows closure preservation uniquely determines Schrödinger-class dynamics (not assumed)
Hamiltonians	Derived / Descriptors	B4 shows Hamiltonians are bookkeeping devices, not fundamental operators (not assumed)
Born rule	Derived / Forced	B5 proves quadratic weighting is the only rule preserving coherence (not assumed)
Measurement	Derived / Commit	B5 shows measurement is AX-PAR partition, not a new postulate (not assumed)
Probabilities	Derived / Epistemic	B5 shows probabilities are branch weights, not fundamental randomness (not assumed)

Critical defence: The B-series imports no quantum axioms. All quantum structure is derived from substrate mechanics (Paper A), tolerance constraints (AX-TOL), and commit semantics (AX-PAR).

Where $W$ Matters — Operational Role Mapping

Paper	Operational Role of $W$	Result Forced
B1	Defines mergeability boundary for divergent histories	Linear amplitude representation
B2	Bounds compatibility load for joint admissibility	Entanglement (non-factorisable cross-terms)
B3	Determines closure stability threshold	Quantisation (discrete spectral selection)
B4	Triggers partition when violated (decoherence boundary)	Unitary dynamics (closure preservation)
B5	Bounds interference structure preserved by weighting	Born rule (quadratic weighting)

Pattern: $W$ is the coherence/mergeability boundary that makes the representational calculus necessary. It is not a free parameter but the structural constraint that forces quantum formalism.

---

Series Completion and Readiness

The B-series (B1–B5) is now structurally complete as a coherent quantum recovery package.

What Is Complete

• ✅ B1 — Linear amplitude representation
• ✅ B2 — Entanglement and non-factorisability
• ✅ B3 — Spectral discreteness and quantisation
• ✅ B4 — Unitary dynamics and Schrödinger evolution
• ✅ B5 — Born rule and measurement emergence

These five papers constitute a complete derivation of non-relativistic quantum mechanics as an effective representational theory emerging from substrate mechanics.

Use Cases

This package is suitable for:

• Formal peer review — As a connected series demonstrating QM emergence
• Defence against “you assumed QM” critiques — Via the audit map above
• Comparison with other emergence programmes — Clear derivation chain and scope boundaries
• Empirical programme development — Once $W$ is calibrated, predictions become testable

Optional Extensions (Not Required)

Future optional papers may include:

• B-BELL — Bell inequalities as constraint-correlation theorems
• B-CAL — Empirical calibration of $W$
• B-EX — Worked physical examples (hydrogen, interferometry)

These are not required for the core B-series completion. They are downstream applications.

---

Further Reading

B-Series Papers (Read in Order)

1. Paper B1 — Emergence of Quantum State Representation
2. Paper B2 — Non-Factorisable Composition and Entanglement
3. Paper B3 — Spectral Discreteness from Closure Stability
4. Paper B4 — Quantum Dynamics from Commit-Based Evolution
5. Paper B5 — Measurement and the Born Rule

Supporting Documents

• Research Programme — Epistemic roles and programme structure
• B-Series Outline — Programme-facing narrative
• Paper A — Substrate Mechanics — Substrate definition
• Axioms Registry — Axiom definitions
• R-DCC — Derived Capability Classes — Capability envelope definitions

Prerequisites (Optional, for Deeper Context)

• Paper M1 — Cohesion and Persistence
• Paper M2 — Admissibility, Precedence, Construction
• Paper M3 — Modes and Discrete Stability
• Paper M4 — Provenance, Phase, and Compatibility Structure
• E-series papers — Empirical narrowing and emergence programmes

---

Summary

The B-series demonstrates that quantum mechanics is the unique stable calculus for representing cohesive substrates exhibiting mergeable divergence under finite tolerance $W$.

Key claims:

• All quantum structure (Hilbert space, linearity, entanglement, quantisation, unitary dynamics, Born rule) is derived, not assumed
• Quantum formalism is forced by representational consistency, not imposed as axioms
• The derivation is stepwise and rigorous, with no circular dependencies

Key boundaries:

• B-series is representational recovery, not ontology (see F-series for ontological claims)
• B-series is not a new quantum theory — it explains why standard QM has the form it does
• Gravity, QFT, and empirical calibration remain future work

The B-series is now ready for external review and engagement.